<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Co-op search for LIS research</title>
	<link>http://blisspix.net/2006/10/27/google-co-op-search-for-lis-research/</link>
	<description>Open access, technology and social futures from a librarian in Sydney.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Google Co-op search for LIS research by: VALIS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Search roundup</title>
		<link>http://blisspix.net/2006/10/27/google-co-op-search-for-lis-research/#comment-19997</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 23:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blisspix.net/2006/10/27/google-co-op-search-for-lis-research/#comment-19997</guid>
					<description>[...] Google has launched Co-op, a site-specific search engine along the lines of Rollyo. Phil Bradley has a write-up, and created his own library blog search engine. Fiona Bradley has created a LIS research search engine. Over on NZ-Libs (not archived online, as far as I can tell), Sean Murgatroyd (I think, I don&#8217;t have access to the list at the moment) pointed out a darker side to Co-op: the possibility that someone could create an engine that seemingly searched innocuous, useful sites, but also searched sites that contained obscene or commercial content. Google doesn&#8217;t want people using &#8220;Google&#8221; as a generic adjective to mean &#8220;searche the web&#8221;. OK. From now on, I&#8217;m &#8220;Yahoo!ing&#8221;, even if I&#8217;m using Google or Ask. Actually, &#8220;Asking&#8221; sounds pretty good, too&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Google has launched Co-op, a site-specific search engine along the lines of Rollyo. Phil Bradley has a write-up, and created his own library blog search engine. Fiona Bradley has created a LIS research search engine. Over on NZ-Libs (not archived online, as far as I can tell), Sean Murgatroyd (I think, I don&#8217;t have access to the list at the moment) pointed out a darker side to Co-op: the possibility that someone could create an engine that seemingly searched innocuous, useful sites, but also searched sites that contained obscene or commercial content. Google doesn&#8217;t want people using &#8220;Google&#8221; as a generic adjective to mean &#8220;searche the web&#8221;. OK. From now on, I&#8217;m &#8220;Yahoo!ing&#8221;, even if I&#8217;m using Google or Ask. Actually, &#8220;Asking&#8221; sounds pretty good, too&#8230; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
